Самое интересное - если заставить их через суд, огласить причину отказа.
«Все, что касается запрета на въезд в отношении конкретных лиц, является предназначенной для внутреннего пользования информацией, которая засекречивается на 75 лет», — ответил пресс-секретарь МВД Михкель Лойде на вопрос о том, мог ли приезд Валерия Тишкова угрожать внутренней безопасности Эстонской Республики.
«Все, что касается запрета на въезд в отношении конкретных лиц, является предназначенной для внутреннего пользования информацией, которая засекречивается на 75 лет», — ответил пресс-секретарь МВД Михкель Лойде на вопрос о том, мог ли приезд Валерия Тишкова угрожать внутренней безопасности Эстонской Республики.
Restrictions on the right of entry and the right of residence on grounds of public policy, public security or public health
EU citizens or members of their family may be expelled from the host country on grounds of public policy, public security or public health. Under no circumstances may an expulsion decision be taken on economic grounds. Measures affecting freedom of movement and residence must comply with the proportionality principle and be based exclusively on the personal conduct of the individual concerned. Such conduct must represent a genuine, sufficiently serious and present threat which affects the fundamental interests of society.
Previous criminal convictions do not automatically justify expulsion. The mere fact that the entry documents used by the individual concerned have expired does not constitute grounds for such a measure.
In any event, before taking an expulsion decision, the country must assess a number of factors such as the period for which the individual concerned has been resident, his or her age, state of health, degree of integration and family and economic situation in the host country and links with the country of origin. The level of protection against expulsion for the EU citizen increases with the length of stay. Thus, if the EU citizen has resided in the host country for 10 years (or if he is a minor), an expulsion decision can only be taken on imperative grounds of public security.
Public health may only be used to justify restricting free movement, if it concerns diseases with epidemic potential (as defined by the World Health Organisation) and other infectious diseases or contagious parasitic diseases.
The person concerned by a decision refusing leave to enter or reside in an EU country must be notified in writing of that decision in such a way that they are able to understand its content and implications. The grounds for the decision must be given and the person concerned must be informed of the appeal procedures available to them. Except in emergencies, the subject of such decisions must be allowed at least 1 month in which to leave the country.
Lifelong exclusion orders cannot be issued under any circumstances. Persons concerned by exclusion orders can apply for the situation to be reviewed after 3 years. The Directive also makes provision for a series of procedural guarantees. In particular the individuals concerned have access to judicial review and, where appropriate, to administrative review in the host Member State.
§ 8. Suspension of the right of stay of a citizen of the European Union
(1) The right of stay in Estonia of a citizen of the European Union may be suspended if there is good reason to believe that the person concerned poses a threat to public order or national security of Estonia or to the health of other persons.
§ 11. Suspension of the right of stay of a family member
(1) The right of stay in Estonia of a family member may be suspended if there is good reason to believe that the person concerned poses a threat to public order or national security of Estonia or to the health of other persons.
Мы используем cookies-файлы, чтобы улучшить работу сайта и Ваше взаимодействие с ним. Если Вы продолжаете использовать этот сайт, вы даете IMHOCLUB разрешение на сбор и хранение cookies-файлов на вашем устройстве.
О свободе перемещения
№30 Руслан Икаев
→ Сергей Леонидов,
07.10.2015
10:22
О свободе перемещения
№27 Руслан Икаев
→ Константин Рудаков,
07.10.2015
10:20
О свободе перемещения
№26 Руслан Икаев
→ Игорь Чернявский,
07.10.2015
10:18
«Все, что касается запрета на въезд в отношении конкретных лиц, является предназначенной для внутреннего пользования информацией, которая засекречивается на 75 лет», — ответил пресс-секретарь МВД Михкель Лойде на вопрос о том, мог ли приезд Валерия Тишкова угрожать внутренней безопасности Эстонской Республики.
О свободе перемещения
№24 Руслан Икаев
→ Сергей Леонидов,
07.10.2015
10:16
О свободе перемещения
№20 Руслан Икаев
→ Сергей Леонидов,
07.10.2015
10:08
http://nr2.com.ua/News/Lithuania_and_Baltics/Estoniya-otkazyvaetsya-soobshchat-pochemu-zapretila-vezd-akademiku-Tishkovu--82211.html
© HP2
О свободе перемещения
№18 Руслан Икаев
→ Сергей Леонидов,
07.10.2015
10:01
О свободе перемещения
№16 Руслан Икаев
→ Элла Журавлёва,
07.10.2015
09:56
О свободе перемещения
№13 Руслан Икаев
→ Марк Козыренко,
07.10.2015
09:53
О свободе перемещения
№11 Руслан Икаев
07.10.2015
09:50
Restrictions on the right of entry and the right of residence on grounds of public policy, public security or public health
EU citizens or members of their family may be expelled from the host country on grounds of public policy, public security or public health. Under no circumstances may an expulsion decision be taken on economic grounds. Measures affecting freedom of movement and residence must comply with the proportionality principle and be based exclusively on the personal conduct of the individual concerned. Such conduct must represent a genuine, sufficiently serious and present threat which affects the fundamental interests of society.
Previous criminal convictions do not automatically justify expulsion. The mere fact that the entry documents used by the individual concerned have expired does not constitute grounds for such a measure.
In any event, before taking an expulsion decision, the country must assess a number of factors such as the period for which the individual concerned has been resident, his or her age, state of health, degree of integration and family and economic situation in the host country and links with the country of origin. The level of protection against expulsion for the EU citizen increases with the length of stay. Thus, if the EU citizen has resided in the host country for 10 years (or if he is a minor), an expulsion decision can only be taken on imperative grounds of public security.
Public health may only be used to justify restricting free movement, if it concerns diseases with epidemic potential (as defined by the World Health Organisation) and other infectious diseases or contagious parasitic diseases.
The person concerned by a decision refusing leave to enter or reside in an EU country must be notified in writing of that decision in such a way that they are able to understand its content and implications. The grounds for the decision must be given and the person concerned must be informed of the appeal procedures available to them. Except in emergencies, the subject of such decisions must be allowed at least 1 month in which to leave the country.
Lifelong exclusion orders cannot be issued under any circumstances. Persons concerned by exclusion orders can apply for the situation to be reviewed after 3 years. The Directive also makes provision for a series of procedural guarantees. In particular the individuals concerned have access to judicial review and, where appropriate, to administrative review in the host Member State.
http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=URISERV:l33152
О свободе перемещения
№8 Руслан Икаев
07.10.2015
09:26
(1) The right of stay in Estonia of a citizen of the European Union may be suspended if there is good reason to believe that the person concerned poses a threat to public order or national security of Estonia or to the health of other persons.
§ 11. Suspension of the right of stay of a family member
(1) The right of stay in Estonia of a family member may be suspended if there is good reason to believe that the person concerned poses a threat to public order or national security of Estonia or to the health of other persons.
https://www.riigiteataja.ee/en/eli/513012015011/consolide
Сбывается проклятие Каддафи
№14 Руслан Икаев
→ Владимир Копылков,
12.09.2015
13:06
Хроника гибели Германии
№212 Руслан Икаев
→ Вячеслав Ермолин,
07.09.2015
20:37
Хроника гибели Германии
№140 Руслан Икаев
→ Сергей Алексеевич,
07.09.2015
16:20
Хроника гибели Германии
№113 Руслан Икаев
→ Сук дин Роший, натурал,
07.09.2015
15:07
Хроника гибели Германии
№15 Руслан Икаев
→ Юрий Янсон,
07.09.2015
10:13
Хроника гибели Германии
№11 Руслан Икаев
→ Юрий Янсон,
07.09.2015
09:50
Хроника гибели Германии
№8 Руслан Икаев
07.09.2015
09:18
Победное лето 1945-го
№54 Руслан Икаев
→ Борис Мельников,
03.09.2015
13:36
Без паники
№10 Руслан Икаев
03.09.2015
12:31
Неудачный пример. Когда американцы начали сближаться саудитами, Израиля ещё не существовало, разве что в проекте.
Селекция и вивисекция
№191 Руслан Икаев
→ Надежда Емельянова,
29.08.2015
13:01